Medical Hardship Scholarships
During our investigation into Alabama's attrition, codenamed "The March to 85," we have stumbled across two things that have really baffled the life out of us, medical hardship scholarships and the Bryant scholarship program. But before we dive off into the Bryant scholarship topic, we want to recap the medical hardship scholarship process that moves an injured football player from his football scholarship onto a "medical hardship" scholarship so that he can finish his education on scholarship but not have it count against the limit of 85 players. Plus we want to share the story of Zeke Knight.
To the best of our knowledge medical hardships are handled on a university by university basis, meaning that each school's medical team determines, on their own, which players are deemed medically eligible to play or not. This is not something that is regulated by the NCAA, and to the best of our knowledge a player can not hire a doctor on his own or challenge a medical ruling by the school's doctors.
Once the school's medical team deems you as medically ineligible that is pretty much it; it then becomes a decision by the head coach as to whether or not the player should be released from his football scholarship to free it up to be used on a new recruit or to allow the player to continue to contribute in whatever limited capacity for which he is medically cleared. In some cases there is no question that the coach has absolutely no say in the decision. However, as we pointed out earlier, Mike D'Andrea remained on football scholarship and continued to rehab and work with the team at Ohio State for 3 years after his initial injury - and although he never saw the field again, he graduated with his class and worked with the team in whatever capacity he was cleared to and given the nature of his injuries we can only imagine that at times he couldn't do much more than walk around on crutches and attend team meetings or film review sessions.
Alabama's Zeke Knight on the other hand was placed on medical hardship scholarship and released from his football scholarship, but didn't believe that he should have been removed and filed a request to transfer to a smaller school in hopes of continuing to play out his career.
"In a very heartfelt speech, Coach Saban thanked Zeke, but said he could no longer play at Alabama for medical reasons.
He said:
"Zeke is a fine young man and we appreciate all that he has done for this program. Zeke did a great job for us as a starter and, more importantly, is on track to graduate in August. I would like nothing more than to have him with us for one more season on the football field... I wish him and his family nothing but the best. Zeke Knight will always be a part of the Crimson Tide family."
With that, he graduated from Alabama and wasn't sure where to turn with eligibility left. He needed to figure out what it was he had and how to take care of himself. He took some time off to get well and regain medical clearance. Knight said, “I felt like I might as well go back for one more year and eliminate all the questions about me being able to play.” Knight said he considered several options. After a year away from football, a host of skeptical cardiologists, neurologists and other doctors examined him. After hours of testing Zeke to see if he was able to play the sport he loved again, on July 30, 2009, they completely cleared Zeke to play football. His APO was resolved and the clinical neurological examination did not reveal any localizing cranial, motor, sensory or reflex deficits.
What to do? “It kind of dawned on me a little bit, like maybe I was meant to finish my last year in Tuscaloosa,” Knight said. After all, he now bled Crimson and had so many friends in Tuscaloosa.
His new Coach, said it best, “People had doubts that he could play anymore. It was a life-threatening situation for him. He made it through, and we got one more (year of eligibility by the NCAA)... I take my hat off to the young man.” After seeing him play, his coach bragged, "It helps us to get Ezekial Knight. He’s a real experienced linebacker that’s going to really bring something to the table for me... I’m very impressed with him. I can see why he played at the University of Alabama. That guy, to me, is a top-round draft choice. He’s an amazing football player... Zeke is a quiet leader. He doesn’t say very much on the field, but he’s always working to get better.” Stats were not well tracked at Stillman, but Zeke had around 8.5 sacks, second in the nation in Division II. He had around 42 tackles, 3 forced fumbles (2 returned by teammates for touchdowns), and 1 interception.
He finished well and now Zeke Knight is looking towards proving that, like Tedy Bruschi, he has the (healed) heart... and courage of a Knight. He is ready for the next level, with only his past as his present obstacle."
This is an emotional topic and an emotional story, no question. There is also no question that anyone could argue that the University of Alabama was simply doing what they thought was best for Zeke Knight given his health condition, and after all, if something were to happen to Zeke, the University doctors could be liable for putting him at risk. You could walk that argument into a court of law (or public opinion) and win every single time without breaking a sweat.
There is, however, another side to this story, one that is going to sound like we are trying to spin Zeke's story into a tale of blatant player abuse, one that probably makes it sound like Nick Saban has no heart and is a ruthless, cold-blooded killer. We don't believe any of those things. Nick Saban at his worst is only guilty of being a high-paid coach who is being paid millions of dollars to win football games, championships specifically, nothing more, nothing less. It's up to each individual to determine whether or not they think that Saban will win at any cost or whether or not he discards players in an attempt to gain a competitive advantage. We happen to think he does by the way, but that is just our opinion.
The other side of Zeke Knight's story is that the year he was released from his football scholarship and placed on a medical hardship scholarship was also the same year that Nick Saban signed 32 new recruits to Alabama and was facing a tremendous numbers crunch in order to get his roster down to 85 players or face penalties from the NCAA. Nick Saban and Alabama were also coming off of a dismal 7-6 season and it was imperative that Saban improve the team immediately to justify his salary, which at the time was one of the highest in college football.

Zeke Knight was not alone in the list of players that were removed from football scholarships in order to get the roster down to 85, several others were removed for various reasons as shown above.
In addition to Alabama being in a numbers crunch, it probably didn't help Knight's case any that Saban had signed 4 linebackers that year, 1 five star and 3 four star, and freshman linebacker Rolando McClain was bursting onto the scene as a future star.
Honestly, if not the for the oversigning and the mandatory roster cuts as a result of oversigning, we probably wouldn't scrutinize things like this so much, but when you have a coach and program that are habitual abusers of oversigning one can't help but find situations like Zeke Knight's extremely intriguing or suspicious. Let's put it this way, if Saban took regular numbers and didn't need to cut players in order to get his roster down to 85 and avoid NCAA violations, and Zeke Knight was still released from his football scholarship, we would be much more inclined to think that Knight's departure had nothing to do with roster cuts. In fact, we would probably be writing a piece on what a stand up guy Saban was for protecting Knight at the risk of roster shortfalls and depth problems at his position - we would be commending Saban for recruiting by the numbers in the spirit of maintaining a level playing field and not abusing loopholes, and for putting his own career at risk in order to do the right thing both by the game of college football and by Zeke Knight. But that's not what happened, instead Saban over-stuffed his roster with scholarship commitments and had no choice but to pick 8-10 guys to cut from the team. It is that simple.
Moving players to a medical scholarship, in legitimate cases, is a win win scenario, the player gets to continue his education for free and it lessens the likelihood of APR penalties for the school because as long as the player continues his education and graduates the school is in the clear; it also frees up the player's football scholarship so that it can be given to a new recruit. Seems harmless.
We found several cases of legitimate medical hardship cases, but for some reason, medical hardship scholarships and oversigning seem to go hand in had at Alabama, and other schools such as North Carolina; whereas you just don't see or hear about it anywhere else around the country. We did some digging on Ohio State's medical hardship cases and found about 4 or 5 over the last ten years; Saban has that many in 2 or 3.
The only thing we know to do is to somehow get oversigning removed (for real) and then let's see if the medical hardships continue, and if they do then we know they were legit; the only downside, for guys like Saban, is that once you do away with oversigning, the medical hardships become holes in the roster that lead to depth problems.







March 30th, 2010 - 10:40
I have read this site with the hope that it would provide something positive in regards to the ins and outs of CFB, but all it does is demonstrate a fan who is a OSU fan at heart and upset that OSU and the Big-10 can no longer compete nationally. This website is an outlet for excuses why other teams win and OSU can not. No matter how you spin it or if many agree that some practices should be addressed by the NCAA or are just simply wrong in recruiting and meeting the roster limits no team including the ones you seem to continually go after on this site have done nothing wrong that would penalize them with sanctions other than get some upset fan from a once historic program to lash out against them. Period if I am wrong please show me where rules have been broken and again not your opinion fo why you think it is wrong. I only want the facts and in this the facts are where are the rules being broken.
The fact is that CFB is a business, just like why the Big-10 is trying to add teams to their conference for the money and why they support the BCS because no matter how the Big-10 does they still get the revenues unlike some teams in the country who do not because they do not belong to a BCS conference. I guess it is alright that the big-10 can exploit that by having subpar performances and still get rich doing it. To me a very bad business decision to reward underperforming teams for their efforts but I guess it is alright.
In regards to medical hardships who cares. A player when recruited is promised one thing and that is a education and an opportunity for them to graduate from that university. If they get that who cares because they got what they were promised. In regards to playing football all they are told is they will get an opportunity but they will have to earn it. Many players stay with the team and do not see much of the field. I would bank that if I looked at any roster there would be more players on it that saw little time playing and still stayed with the team counting against the roster than ones being given medical hardships.
Again all this website does is give you an OSU fan an outlet to vent your dislike to any team that demonstrates more success than OSU. It is all opinion and theory with nothing that would substaniate any wrong doing by any university unless some agree that it might be wrong. But again that is just your opinion and merits nothing more on your part. So some schools focus on winning and why not. Why have scores and conference championships if winning is not the number one priority or is it because your coach or school does not go about it in the same manner as Saban or other coaches to win and so instead of questioning OSU on its ways you automatically sit in your Ivory tower and condem all others for their practices. Again nothing illegal has been done, just you do not like it.
I guess maybe I should have sympathy for OSU and the Big-10 for no longer sharing in the national spotlight other than getting a piece of the BCS pie. Maybe they will bounce back one day but who knows because just like in business companies that fail to adapt to current business strategies and practices never recover become a thing of the past. But I guess I can understand that when you look at the major businesses in the Big-10 country like the automakers who failed to adapt to current changes and blamed everyone else for their failures the Big-10 conference seems to do the same.
March 30th, 2010 - 12:10
Mike, you are correct, oversigning is not a violation of NCAA rules, it is more of a question of ethics than it is of whether or not someone is violating NCAA rules. The purpose of this site is to investigate oversigning: who does it, why do they do it, how do they do it, does it damage players, does it create a competitive advantage, etc. This site is not all about picking on one program or another based on emotions or affiliations. If this site is guilty of anything it is having too narrow of a focus, but in our defense it is extremely time consuming and difficult to investigate all 60+ BCS teams. Ohio State and Alabama happen to be at opposite ends of the oversigning spectrum and provide good compare and contrasting examples. Our hope here is that readers and fans of other programs contribute content that expands the focus, hopefully in time that will happen.
With regards to your claim that this site exists because the Big 10 and Ohio State are no longer competitive and we are lashing out, you have provided no substantiating data to support that claim.
1. The Big 10 is very competitive, despite the drastically different methods of managing the rosters. Case and point, Northwestern vs. Auburn and Penn State vs. LSU in the last bowl season; not to mention the overall head to head record of the Big 10 vs. the SEC since the start of the BCS.
2. If we were looking to pick on schools that have had more success than Ohio State, why wouldn’t we be attacking Texas and USC? The simple answer is because they do not abuse oversigning. Like we said, bring us another program that abuses oversigning more than Alabama and Nick Saban and we’ll focus on them, until then they have the spotlight.
3. Your comments about medical hardship scholarships is emblematic of the mindset of many fans who favor a team or a coach that cuts players. Cutting players, by in larger, is the professionalization of college football. And it is our opinion that coaches with real integrity who recruit players with solid character have no need to cut players and won’t cut players, whether it be because they are injury prone or because they have failed to live up their billing. That is just our opinion, you don’t have to agree with it.
4. I don’t see the connection between automakers and the Big 10 universities. But maybe I should.
March 30th, 2010 - 12:32
In regards to number 3 I fail to see your point, especially in regards to Saban. I believe he is recruiting the same players that OSU is. Maybe I am mistaking and OSU is not recruiting B Miller OH, D Arnett MI, M Bennett OH, T DePriest OH, and many more form Big-10 country. So your statement about comparing coaches and the merits of chosing based on character fall a little short here.
The fact is CFB is a business and coaches are here to win. How they maximize their resources might be questioned by some that feel it gives them a unfair advantage, but I have yet to see that. The fact is these same schools you bash for doing it are recruiting the same players that OSU is recruiting. So OSU has the same opportunity to recruit from the same resources and be successful on the filed. Just like no matter what practices they decide to fill their roster each year, each school still only has 85 availible to put on the field and coach to success. Maybe it has to do more with coaching than it does an unfair practice veiwed through one fan’s eyes.
March 30th, 2010 - 11:54
I agree with the above poster that I’d hope that this site starts to expand their scope beyond Ohio State and Alabama. As a Buckeye fan, I am certainly proud of the program that Jim Tressel has put together but the continued focus on these two programs will lessens the message.
As for the above comment that,
“In regards to medical hardships who cares. A player when recruited is promised one thing and that is a education and an opportunity for them to graduate from that university. If they get that who cares because they got what they were promised.”
The issue is fairness. The NCAA should make sure that all schools are on the same playing field in terms of player eligibility and roster limits. I agree with the owner of this site that they have neglected their duty in this area.
The Big Ten has nearly as much top end talent as the SEC which is easily demonstrable by looking at the NFL draft over the last 5-10-25 years. It has been noted by some experts that the main difference between the SEC and the Big Ten is in terms of 2nd and 3rd team talent.
What is the best way to accumulate depth on a college team? Oversigning.
March 30th, 2010 - 12:14
We need help expanding the content…our hope is that over time as people read or see articles on oversigning or issues related to oversigning that they bring them up here and we discuss it and investigate it further. The point is well taken, the message will be diminished if the focus remains too narrow. We’ll work on that. Thanks for the comments and thanks for reading.
March 30th, 2010 - 16:15
It could also be said that the wealthier schools in the Big-10 are able to avoid oversigning through a reliance on a plethora of walk-on players. In this manner, these schools rely upon significant number of individuals to personal fund and support the football team. In this manner the provide both the brawn and the financing to keep the football program operational.
On the other side, it appears clear that poorer southern schools must rely upon scholarships to fill football slots. It should be noted that most of the SEC schools have a total roster number closer to the 85 scholarship limit, than schools in the Big-12 and Big-10. It does not appear to be a coincidence that OSU, Michigan, Texas and Nebraska are the bottom half of your oversigning offender list, while also appearing as the teams at the top of the list of programs having the most players on the roster.