We found the list below posted over at shaggybevo.com. Basically, this is Nick Saban's attrition since 2007 (this is not all of it, just what was listed at shaggybevo.com).
|2007 (25 Players Signed)||2008 (32 Players Signed)||2009 (27 Players Signed)||2010 (26 Players Signed)||2011 (22 Players Signed +2 GS)|
|Crump - quit football||Johns - arrested, cocaine||Dial - grades, juco||Grant - not renewed||Glenn Harbin - baseball|
|Elder - armed robbery||Bolton - grades*||Moore - grades||Sikes - not renewed||Demetrius Goode - transfer|
|Fanuzzi - transfer||Hood - MLB||P. Hall - transfer Div II||McKeller - medical hardship||Petey Smith - transfer|
|Hester - transfer||Jackson - transfer||Burnthall - quit team||Jackson - transfer||Brandon Moore - transfer|
|Lett - medical hardship||Lawrence - transfer||Fanney - transfer||Sims - din't qualify||Corey Grant - transfer|
|McGaskin - grades||Lewis - grades||Cardwell - not renewed||Pharr - medical hardship||Arron Douglas - died|
|Murphy - grades*||Matchett - medical hardship||Higgenbotham - transfer So. Ala||Talbert - medical hardship||Robby Green - released|
|Ricks - grades||Neighbors - bryant scholarship||Kirschman - not renewed||Woodson - not renewed||Kerry Murphy - medical hardship|
|Tayler - transfer||Preyear - kicked off team||Hester - medical hardship||Kendall Kelly - medical hardship|
|Farmer - transfer||Ray - MLB||Wes Neighbors - medical hardship|
|Smith - transfer|
* = guys who were resigned later so they get counted twice by websites like oversigning.com.
Quit - 1, kicked off - 2, Other Scholly - 3, Transfer - 7. MLB - 2, Grades - 8
Couple of things to note here:
1. Where would Alabama have been had they taken normal numbers and still suffered the same attrition? Or would they have had the same amount of attrition? Those are the primary questions. Had Alabama signed a normal amount of players (18-21) and still had kids transfer out, commit armed robbery, and fail to make their grades, there would be gaping holes in the roster that would have crippled the program for years.
Let's break it down by class: let's say in 2007 Alabama signs 21 guys and suffers the attrition of 10 players, that puts that class at 11 players; in 2008 let's say Alabama signs 25 in order to make up for the attrition the previous year, but suffers the attrition of 11 players, that puts them at 14 players.
The last time Alabama had back to back season with less than 20 players you have to look at 2002 and 2003, 19 & 19; that was the last time they were unable to sign extra players because of scholarship reductions. Here's their record: 2002: 10-3, 2003: 4-9, 2004: 6-6, 2005: 10-2, 2006: 6-7. 2007: 7-6. Could you imagine if they had to deal with only 11 & 14 players in back to back classes because of all the attrition? They wouldn't win a game.
2. How did Nick Saban miss on all these guys - he is regarded as one of the best recruiters in the country? Or, is it that Saban just runs through more players and the cream rises to the top? That has to be the case because we have already documented that he signed roughly 35-51 more players than Brown, Tressel, and Carroll.
3. Why does this even happen? Schools all over the country such as Notre Dame, Penn State, Ohio State, Texas, USC, etc. do not need to do this. Is it because the available talent pool is prone to that much more attrition and without oversigning to cover for it Alabama would be dead in the water, or is it because they prefer to go through more guys just to keep them away from the competition? Our historical research showed that they used to do it (oversign) for both reasons.
And for those that argue "those extra guys don't count because they didn't make it into school or they transferred out," we say, if they don't count then why sign them to begin with? Take normal numbers and deal with the attrition - why should Alabama, or any school for that matter because this is not about singling out Alabama this goes for any school, be allowed to subsidize its attrition while other schools take normal numbers and either avoid attrition by taking better quality (academic and character) guys or "take it in the chops," as Nick Saban would say, meaning if they have attrition then they have a hole in the roster until they can fill it with the next recruiting class. How is it that these other schools only take 18-22 guys every year and still compete on the same field for the national championship as a team that takes 28-32 and culls down their roster? You can thank the NCAA for allowing the oversigning loophole to exist, then you can thank the conference commissioners and athletic directors for allowing their schools to exploit the loophole, and finally you can thank the multi-million dollar coaches who exploit it. Hopefully one day you can thank us for helping to eliminate this from college football all together.
Bottom line: Either Alabama takes extra players to cover the expected attrition because they have to given the pool of players they have to select from, which means if they took regular numbers they might not be able to field a team, or Alabama takes extra players in order to have a larger pool of players to pick from thus pushing out lesser quality players by way of medical hardships, transfers, poor grades, violation of team rules, or armed robbery. Those are the only two reasons and neither of them are appealing. Anyone who thinks otherwise either doesn't get it or has an agenda.
One last comment on this. If Alabama (and other SEC schools) truly take more signees because the pool of players they have to select from dictates that they need to take extra to account for the mass numbers that won't make it academically, isn't that an indication of a much bigger problem? And what kind of message is it sending to kids? Shouldn't the message be: "if you want to play football here you need to be squared away academically or we can't even afford to look at you as a prospect."
We have already compiled recruiting numbers for schools and conferences, see our "Recruiting Numbers" link above for that data, but now let's take a look at the numbers for National Championship coaches from 2002-2010. Make sure to read our footnotes at the bottom regarding the data in the table below.
National Championship Coaches 2002 - 2010
The first thing that jumps off the screen is that despite being out of college football for 2 years (2005 & 2006), Nick Saban still signed 193 recruits, which is second only to Les Miles his successor at LSU when Saban left in 2005. Saban also has the highest average recruits per year at 27.50. In 7 years, Nick Saban has never signed less than 25 recruits in a single year.
Let's compare that to the same set of years (2002-2004 & 2007-2010) for the coach with the lowest numbers, Jim Tressel. Tressel signed 142 players in the same years that Saban signed 193 recruits. That is a difference of 51 players over the same period of time, 7 years. That is mind boggling to say the least.
And to further put that into perspective, only 4 BCS programs in the entire country have signed fewer players than Ohio State's Jim Tressel, Stanford (170), Georgia Tech (177), Wake Forest (174), and Northwestern (170). Notre Dame tied with (180). For Jim Tressel to win a NC, compete for 2 more, and win the Big 10 Conference 5 Times in a row with those kind of numbers is simply amazing. The same goes for Pete Carroll, although his numbers are just slightly higher, and what he did at USC. Imagine if either one of those coaches had an extra 40-50 players to select from or to use in order to fill in gaps from unexpected attrition such as career ending injury.
Click the link to continue reading >>>